數表 Tables返回
1.而家想請你用0-100分評價你對發展局局長林鄭月娥既支持程度，0分代表絕對唔支持，100分代表絕對支持，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分發展局局長林鄭月娥呢？ (按月計算)
2.假設明天你有權投票決定續任或者罷免林鄭月娥作為發展局局長，你會投續任、罷免、定棄權票？ (按月計算)
3.你認為林鄭月娥做發展局局長既工作做得好唔好? (按月計算)
1.Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to the Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Secretary for Development Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor? (monthly average)
2.If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor as the Secretary for Development tomorrow, how would you vote? (monthly average)
3.Do you think Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor is doing a good or bad job as the Secretary for Development? (monthly average)
| 調查月份 Month of Survey |
0至100支持度評分 0-100 support rating |
假想投票續任率 Hypothetical vote share on reappointment |
工作表現認許率 Job performance approval rate |
| 6/2012 | - | 72.6% | - |
| 5/2012 | - | 75.7% | - |
| 4/2012 | - | 73.8% | - |
| 3/2012 | - | 66.6% | - |
| 2/2012 | - | 62.2% | - |
| 1/2012 | - | 62.7% | - |
| 12/2011 | - | 61.7% | - |
| 11/2011 | - | 62.4% | - |
| 10/2011 | - | 61.0% | - |
| 9/2011 | - | 57.1% | - |
| 8/2011 | - | 56.1% | - |
| 7/2011 | - | 51.4% | - |
| 6/2011 | - | 41.9% | - |
| 5/2011 | - | 50.9% | - |
| 4/2011 | - | 48.5% | - |
| 3/2011 | - | 44.7% | - |
| 2/2011 | - | 50.9% | - |
| 1/2011 | - | 49.4% | - |
| 12/2010 | 56.2 | 56.2% | - |
| 11/2010 | - | 49.3% | - |
| 10/2010 | - | 52.7% | - |
| 9/2010 | 57.3 | 51.4% | - |
| 8/2010 | - | 48.0% | - |
| 7/2010 | - | 48.3% | - |
| 6/2010 | 54.4 | 49.9% | - |
| 5/2010 | - | 46.1% | - |
| 4/2010 | - | 47.5% | - |
| 3/2010 | 57.1 | 52.2% | - |
| 2/2010 | - | 45.4% | - |
| 1/2010 | - | 48.5% | - |
| 12/2009 | 54.6 | 49.0% | - |
| 11/2009 | - | 45.2% | - |
| 10/2009 | - | 51.0% | - |
| 9/2009 | 55.4 | 46.1% | - |
| 8/2009 | - | 47.1% | - |
| 7/2009 | - | 49.8% | - |
| 6/2009 | 56.8 | 51.8% | - |
| 5/2009 | - | 54.1% | - |
| 4/2009 | - | 49.9% | - |
| 3/2009 | 55.4 | 47.3% | - |
| 2/2009 | - | 49.9% | - |
| 1/2009 | - | 47.0% | - |
| 12/2008 | 54.8 | 47.0% | - |
| 11/2008 | - | 42.0% | - |
| 10/2008 | - | 46.3% | - |
| 9/2008 | 54.7 | 46.1% | - |
| 8/2008 | - | 45.5% | - |
| 7/2008 | - | 42.5% | - |
| 6/2008 | 60.0 | 46.7% | - |
| 5/2008 | - | 41.9% | - |
| 4/2008 | - | 44.8% | - |
| 3/2008 | 59.4 | 49.7% | - |
| 2/2008 | - | 43.4% | - |
| 1/2008 | - | 44.6% | - |
| 12/2007 | 58.0 | 47.0% | - |
| 11/2007 | - | 49.7% | - |
| 10/2007 | - | 45.2% | - |
| 9/2007 | 59.5 | 49.3% | - |
| 8/2007 | - | 54.8% | - |
| 7/2007 | - | 48.0% | - |
