返回
1. 而家想請你用0-100分評價你對政務司司長唐英年既支持程度,0分代表絕對唔支持,100分代表絕對支持,50分代表一半半,你會俾幾多分政務司司長唐英年呢? (按月計算)
2. 假設明天你有權投票決定續任或者罷免唐英年作為政務司司長,你會投續任、罷免、定棄權票? (按月計算)
3. 你認為唐英年做政務司司長既工作做得好唔好? (按月計算)
1. Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to the Chief Secretary for Administration Henry Tang Ying-yen, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Chief Secretary for Administration Henry Tang Ying-yen? (monthly average)
2. If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of Henry Tang Ying-yen as the Chief Secretary for Administration tomorrow, how would you vote? (monthly average)
3. Do you think Henry Tang Ying-yen is doing a good or bad job as the Chief Secretary for Administration? (monthly average)
調查月份 Month of Survey |
0至100支持度評分 0-100 support rating |
假想投票續任率 Hypothetical vote share on reappointment |
工作表現認許率 Job performance approval rate |
12/2007 | 62.6 | 58.5% | - |
11/2007 | 63.1 | 59.5% | - |
10/2007 | 63.7 | 60.9% | - |
09/2007 | 63.6 | 58.9% | - |
08/2007 | 64.5 | 62.9% | - |
07/2007 | 65.4 | 58.6% | - |
06/2007 | 66.6 | 77.4% | - |
05/2007 | 64.6 | 68.4% | - |
04/2007 | 65.0 | 68.5% | - |
03/2007 | 65.6 | 73.5% | - |
02/2007 | 62.4 | 62.5% | - |
01/2007 | 57.4 | 54.6% | - |
12/2006 | 58.1 | 54.0% | - |
11/2006 | 56.5 | 52.6% | - |
10/2006 | 56.7 | 51.8% | - |
09/2006 | 57.7 | 52.2% | - |
08/2006 | 56.5 | 49.6% | - |
07/2006 | 63.9 | 68.6% | - |
06/2006 | 64.0 | 63.7% | - |
05/2006 | 63.3 | 63.8% | - |
04/2006 | 65.0 | 67.1% | - |
03/2006 | 63.6 | 65.7% | - |
02/2006 | 63.0 | 65.2% | - |
02/2006 | 63.0 | 65.2% | - |
01/2006 | 63.2 | 62.6% | - |
12/2005 | 61.7 | 61.4% | - |
11/2005 | 60.9 | - | - |
10/2005 | 63.6 | 67.8% | - |
09/2005 | 62.5 | - | - |
08/2005 | 63.3 | 70.2% | - |
07/2005 | 63.7 | - | - |
06/2005 | 63.0 | 63.3% | - |
05/2005 | 62.1 | - | - |
04/2005 | 61.4 | 60.5% | - |
04/2005 | 61.4 | 60.5% | - |
03/2005 | 61.5 | 63.6% | - |
03/2005 | 61.5 | 63.6% | - |
02/2005 | 58.1 | 61.4% | 44.6% |
01/2005 | 58.0 | - | - |
12/2004 | 59.4 | 62.5% | - |
11/2004 | 60.4 | - | - |
10/2004 | 58.9 | 62.4% | - |
09/2004 | 59.1 | - | - |
08/2004 | 58.4 | 62.4% | 42.7% |
07/2004 | 56.5 | - | - |
06/2004 | 56.3 | 57.2% | - |
05/2004 | 56.5 | - | - |
04/2004 | 58.2 | 59.1% | - |
03/2004 | 59.1 | - | - |
03/2004 | 59.1 | - | - |
03/2004 | 59.1 | - | - |
02/2004 | 57.6 | 53.0% | 31.3% |
01/2004 | 57.0 | - | - |
12/2003 | 54.7 | 46.9% | - |
11/2003 | 56.3 | - | - |
10/2003 | 58.9 | - | - |
09/2003 | 58.2 | 49.7% | - |
08/2003 | 56.5 | - | 29.5% |
07/2003 | 46.8 | - | - |
06/2003 | 55.1 | 46.5% | 29.8% |
05/2003 | 53.3 | - | - |
04/2003 | 55.0 | - | 28.2% |
03/2003 | 51.1 | 40.0% | - |
02/2003 | 52.2 | - | 20.3% |
01/2003 | 51.4 | - | - |
12/2002 | 53.6 | 36.6% | 21.8% |
11/2002 | 52.6 | - | - |
10/2002 | 52.9 | - | 16.3% |
09/2002 | 53.3 | 30.2% | - |
08/2002 | 52.9 | - | 19.5% |
07/2002 | 54.1 | - | - |
06/2002 | 56.4 | - | - |