數表 Tables返回
1.而家想請你用0-100分評價你對政務司司長林鄭月娥既支持程度，0分代表絕對唔支持，100分代表絕對支持，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分政務司司長林鄭月娥呢？ (按月計算)
2.假設明天你有權投票決定續任或者罷免林鄭月娥作為政務司司長，你會投續任、罷免、定棄權票？ (按月計算)
3.你認為林鄭月娥做政務司司長既工作做得好唔好? (按月計算)
1.Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your extent of support to the Chief Secretary for Administration Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, with 0 indicating absolutely not supportive, 100 indicating absolutely supportive and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate the Chief Secretary for Administration Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor? (monthly average)
2.If you had the right to vote on the reappointment or dismissal of Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor as the Chief Secretary for Administration tomorrow, how would you vote? (monthly average)
3.Do you think Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor is doing a good or bad job as the Chief Secretary for Administration? (monthly average)
| 調查月份 Month of Survey |
0至100支持度評分 0-100 support rating |
假想投票續任率 Hypothetical vote share on reappointment |
工作表現認許率 Job performance approval rate |
| - | 51.1 | 44.5% | - |
| - | 53.5 | 40.7% | - |
| 11/2016 | 53.2 | 47.3% | - |
| 10/2016 | 56.1 | 50.3% | - |
| 9/2016 | 51.5 | 42.3% | - |
| 8/2016 | 55.6 | 50.0% | - |
| 7/2016 | 56.1 | 50.3% | - |
| 6/2016 | 53.2 | 48.8% | - |
| 5/2016 | 56.6 | 49.0% | - |
| 4/2016 | 55.4 | 51.0% | - |
| 3/2016 | 54.2 | 50.0% | - |
| 2/2016 | 52.7 | 44.8% | - |
| 1/2016 | 52.1 | 43.9% | - |
| 12/2015 | 59.0 | 51.6% | - |
| 11/2015 | 55.7 | 49.8% | - |
| 10/2015 | 57.4 | 51.7% | - |
| 9/2015 | 56.9 | 52.8% | - |
| 8/2015 | 56.3 | 48.9% | - |
| 7/2015 | 57.2 | 49.0% | - |
| 6/2015 | 55.4 | 54.4% | - |
| 5/2015 | 57.4 | 53.7% | - |
| 4/2015 | 56.2 | 49.2% | - |
| 3/2015 | 54.0 | 46.3% | - |
| 2/2015 | 54.2 | 47.9% | - |
| 1/2015 | 54.8 | 47.4% | - |
| 12/2014 | 54.8 | 50.4% | - |
| 11/2014 | 56.8 | 56.5% | - |
| 10/2014 | 56.3 | 52.9% | - |
| 9/2014 | 55.2 | 46.0% | - |
| 8/2014 | 54.9 | 44.5% | - |
| 7/2014 | 55.9 | 44.6% | - |
| 6/2014 | 59.1 | 51.6% | - |
| 5/2014 | 61.9 | 57.0% | - |
| 4/2014 | 60.7 | 54.0% | - |
| 3/2014 | 61.2 | 53.6% | - |
| 2/2014 | 61.7 | 58.7% | - |
| 1/2014 | 62.0 | 60.4% | - |
| 12/2013 | 59.0 | 57.0% | - |
| 11/2013 | 60.8 | 60.2% | - |
| 10/2013 | 62.0 | 59.9% | - |
| 9/2013 | 63.2 | 61.9% | - |
| 8/2013 | 63.3 | 60.3% | - |
| 7/2013 | 61.9 | 57.1% | - |
| 6/2013 | 60.8 | 58.2% | - |
| 5/2013 | 60.7 | 54.1% | - |
| 4/2013 | 62.2 | 55.9% | - |
| 3/2013 | 60.9 | 60.1% | - |
| 2/2013 | 60.6 | 56.9% | - |
| 1/2013 | 63.4 | 62.7% | - |
| 12/2012 | 63.2 | 61.6% | - |
| 11/2012 | 62.2 | 61.9% | - |
| 10/2012 | 60.1 | 57.6% | - |
| 9/2012 | 58.1 | 54.7% | - |
| 8/2012 | 62.0 | 58.6% | - |
| 7/2012 | 64.0# | 60.2%# | - |
# 原數字有錯誤，特此更正。
# The original figures were mistaken, they are hereby corrected.
