數表返回
如果10分代表目前既法庭絕對公正,0分代表法庭絕對不公正,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分目前既法庭? (半年結)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate the impartiality of the courts in Hong Kong, with 10 indicating absolutely impartial, 0 indicating absolutely not impartial, and 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate the courts? (half-yearly average)
調查日期 Date of survey |
法庭的公正程度評價 Appraisal of Degree of Impartiality of the Courts |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
半年結樣本人數 Total Sample(half year) |
半年結次樣本人數 Sub Sample(half year) |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
1/6/2019 | 6.20 | 0.08 | 1018 | 688 | 669 | 97.3% |
1-6/2018 | 6.69 | 0.13 | 2052 | 1281 | 1221 | 95.3% |
7-12/2017* | 6.89 | 0.08 | 1030 | 654 | 620 | 94.8% |
1-6/2017 | 6.73 | 0.09 | 1029 | 585 | 551 | 94.1% |
7-12/2016 | 6.67 | 0.09 | 1013 | 598 | 561 | 93.7% |
1-6/2016 | 6.84 | 0.08 | 1026 | 609 | 557 | 91.4% |
7-12/2015 | 6.91 | 0.09 | 1010 | 579 | 527 | 91.2% |
1-6/2015 | 7.32 | 0.07 | 1019 | 629 | 591 | 93.9% |
7-12/2014 | 6.91 | 0.09 | 1017 | 578 | 513 | 88.7% |
1-6/2014 | 7.06 | 0.08 | 1031 | 565 | 526 | 93.2% |
7-12/2013 | 7.40 | 0.07 | 1027 | 635 | 601 | 94.6% |
1-6/2013 | 7.24 | 0.08 | 1023 | 588 | 547 | 92.9% |
7-12/2012 | 7.23 | 0.09 | 1040 | 549 | 510 | 92.8% |
1-6/2012 | 7.22 | 0.07 | 1007 | 582 | 527 | 90.6% |
7-12/2011 | 7.04 | 0.08 | 1005 | 585 | 530 | 90.6% |
1-6/2011 | 6.90 | 0.08 | 1035 | 581 | 543 | 93.5% |
7-12/2010 | 6.16 | 0.09 | 1007 | 551 | 526 | 95.5% |
1-6/2010 | 7.40 | 0.08 | 1060 | 537 | 508 | 94.7% |
7-12/2009 | 7.10 | 0.06 | 1006 | 1006 | 931 | 92.6% |
1-6/2009 | 6.84 | 0.06 | 1011 | 1011 | 924 | 91.4% |
7-12/2008 | 7.01 | 0.06 | 1016 | 1016 | 923 | 90.8% |
1-6/2008 | 6.82 | 0.06 | 1028 | 1028 | 926 | 90.1% |
7-12/2007 | 7.03 | 0.06 | 1010 | 1010 | 913 | 90.4% |
1-6/2007 | 7.07 | 0.06 | 1014 | 1014 | 919 | 90.6% |
7-12/2006 | 7.01 | 0.06 | 1019 | 1019 | 937 | 91.9% |
1-6/2006 | 6.90 | 0.05 | 1017 | 1017 | 926 | 91.0% |
7-12/2005 | 6.94 | 0.06 | 2025 | 2025 | 1813 | 89.5% |
1-6/2005 | 7.05 | 0.06 | 2034 | 2034 | 1805 | 88.7% |
7-12/2004 | 6.84 | 0.06 | 2042 | 2042 | 1787 | 87.5% |
1-6/2004 | 6.85 | 0.06 | 2055 | 2055 | 1809 | 88.0% |
7-12/2003 | 6.69 | 0.06 | 2090 | 2090 | 1761 | 84.3% |
1-6/2003 | 6.72 | 0.06 | 2070 | 2070 | 1713 | 82.8% |
7-12/2002 | 6.84 | 0.06 | 2096 | 2096 | 1641 | 78.3% |
1-6/2002 | 6.78 | 0.06 | 2063 | 2063 | 1591 | 77.1% |
7-12/2001 | 6.61 | 0.07 | 2102 | 2102 | 1639 | 78.0% |
1-6/2001 | 6.38 | 0.06 | 2128 | 2128 | 1744 | 82.0% |
7-12/2000 | 6.68 | 0.06 | 2125 | 2125 | 1642 | 77.3% |
1-6/2000 | 6.81 | 0.08 | 2631 | 2631 | 2190 | 83.2% |
7-12/1999 | 6.70 | 0.09 | 1646 | 1646 | 1475 | 89.6% |
1-6/1999 | 6.86 | 0.08 | 1590 | 1590 | 1368 | 86.0% |
7-12/1998 | 6.85 | 0.08 | 1550 | 1550 | 1295 | 83.5% |
1-6/1998 | 6.90 | 0.07 | 1047 | 1047 | 858 | 81.9% |
7-12/1997 | 6.82 | 0.07 | 1087 | 1087 | 881 | 81.0% |
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.