數表返回

如果10分代表目前既司法制度絕對公平，0分代表司法制度絕對不公平，5分代表一半半，你會比幾多分目前既司法制度？ (按次計算)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate the fairness of the judicial system in Hong Kong, with 10 indicating absolutely fair, 0 indicating absolutely unfair, and 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate the present judicial system? (per poll)

調查日期 Date of survey	司法制度的公平程度評價 Appraisal of Degree of Fairness of the Judicial System	標準誤差 Standard Error	樣本人數 Total Sample	次樣本人數 Sub Sample	評分人數 Number of Raters	認知率 Recognition Rate
6-9/5/2019	5.63	0.10	1006	605	597	98.8%
4-9/5/2018	6.35	0.10	1017	516	507	98.3%
15-18/1/2018	6.05	0.09	1035	629	592	94.2%
10-13/7/2017*	6.81	0.08	1030	602	571	94.8%
6-9/02/2017	6.35	0.09	1029	644	606	94.2%
18-21/7/2016	6.16	0.09	1013	580	543	93.7%
15-18/2/2016	6.40	0.09	1026	602	553	91.9%
20-23/7/2015	6.63	0.09	1010	603	562	93.2%
9-12/2/2015	6.89	0.08	1019	615	580	94.3%
21-24/7/2014	6.59	0.08	1017	660	591	89.4%
7-12/2/2014	6.73	0.08	1031	589	550	93.4%
30/7-1/8/2013	6.84	0.08	1027	609	579	95.2%
4-14/2/2013	6.94	0.08	1023	617	581	94.2%
7-15/8/2012	7.04	0.08	1040	571	541	94.7%
13-16/2/2012	6.90	0.08	1007	590	545	92.5%
15-19/8/2011	6.83	0.07	1005	600	556	92.7%
9-17/2/2011	6.64	0.08	1035	567	542	95.6%
10-13/8/2010	6.06	0.09	1007	535	515	96.3%
4-9/2/2010	7.05	0.07	1060	536	510	95.2%
11-16/8/2009	6.73	0.06	1006	1006	964	95.9%
10-12/2/2009	6.56	0.06	1011	1011	941	93.0%
11-14/8/2008	6.78	0.06	1016	1016	940	92.5%
12-14/2/2008	6.64	0.05	1028	1028	947	92.1%
20-24/8/2007	6.90	0.06	1010	1010	935	92.5%
22-26/2/2007	6.85	0.06	1014	1014	922	90.9%
21-23/8/2006	6.72	0.06	1019	1019	938	92.0%
17-21/2/2006	6.66	0.05	1017	1017	939	92.3%
25-29/10/2005	6.81	0.05	1017	1017	941	92.5%
18-20/7/2005	6.68	0.06	1008	1008	913	90.6%
18-21/4/2005	6.75	0.05	1012	1012	912	90.1%
17-19/1/2005	6.72	0.06	1022	1022	936	91.6%
18-21/10/2004	6.59	0.06	1011	1011	894	88.4%
19-21/7/2004	6.54	0.06	1031	1031	927	89.9%
19-22/4/2004	6.25	0.06	1029	1029	901	87.6%
9-12/1/2004	6.50	0.06	1026	1026	918	89.5%
19-22/10/2003	6.33	0.06	1017	1017	871	85.6%
14-16/7/2003	6.18	0.06	1073	1073	931	86.8%
16-23/4/2003	6.40	0.06	1021	1021	881	86.3%
20-23/1/2003	6.44	0.06	1049	1049	887	84.6%
13-16/10/2002	6.47	0.06	1028	1028	875	85.1%
2-3/7/2002	6.42	0.06	1068	1068	842	78.8%
2-8/4/2002	6.62	0.06	1017	1017	823	80.9%
2-6/1/2002	6.29	0.06	1046	1046	865	82.7%
5-8/10/2001	6.31	0.06	1051	1051	843	80.2%
3-9/7/2001	6.38	0.06	1051	1051	853	81.2%
18-30/4/2001	6.03	0.06	1082	1082	921	85.1%
17-19/1/2001	6.00	0.06	1046	1046	863	82.5%
3-9/10/2000	6.11	0.06	1067	1067	839	78.6%
6-10/7/2000	6.15	0.06	1058	1058	863	81.6%
5-18/5/2000	6.50	0.06	1060	1060	916	86.4%
1/3/2000	6.47	0.08	517	517	448	86.7%
11-12/1/2000	6.34	0.08	519	519	463	89.2%
4/1/2000	6.35	0.09	535	535	461	86.2%
1-2/11/1999	6.20	0.08	543	543	492	90.6%
10-13/9/1999	6.12	0.08	576	576	530	92.0%
5/7/1999	5.96	0.09	527	527	486	92.2%
4/5/1999	6.41	0.08	536	536	473	88.2%
2/3/1999	6.60	0.08	510	510	466	91.4%
5/1/1999	6.75	0.07	544	544	491	90.3%
4-5/11/1998	6.58	0.07	511	511	465	91.0%
1/9/1998	6.57	0.07	507	507	468	92.3%
7/7/1998	6.77	0.07	532	532	460	86.5%
2/3/1998	6.70	0.07	527	527	458	86.9%
6/1/1998	6.62	0.07	520	520	446	85.8%
4-5/11/1997	6.51	0.07	523	523	448	85.7%
29-30/7/1997	6.69	0.07	564	564	471	83.5%

* 該調查結果公佈時尚未包括手機樣本。上表結果已更新為固網樣本及手機樣本的合併統計數字。
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.