行政會議成員評分總表 Summary Table of Ratings of Members of Executive Council返回
調查日期 Date of Survey : << 2-4/7/03, ..., 2-4/1/04, 1-3/4/04, 2-5/7/04, 4-7/10/04, 3-6/1/04, ..., , 3-6/10/05 >> |
評分變化 : 行政會議議員
Difference on Ratings : Members of Executive Council
|
« 調查日期 Date of Survey : 1-3/4/04 | 調查日期 Date of Survey : 2-5/7/04 » | |
||||
姓名 Name |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度變化 Difference in support rating |
行政會議非官方議員周梁淑怡 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Selina Chow Liang Shuk-yee | 55.3 | 0.5 | 92.1% | 54.4 | 0.6 | 89.7% | -0.9 |
行政會議非官方議員鄭耀棠 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Cheng Yiu-tong | 43.5 | 0.8 | 72.9% | 43.8 | 0.8 | 74.0% | +0.3 |
行政會議非官方議員曾鈺成 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Jasper Tsang Yok-sing | 40.9 | 0.8 | 85.4% | 40.5 | 0.8 | 85.9% | -0.4 |
行政會議非官方議員梁振英 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Leung Chun-ying | 41.2 | 0.8 | 79.7% | 39.9 | 0.8 | 83.4% | -1.3 |
評分變化 : 行政會議列席成員
Difference on Ratings : Sit-in Members of Executive Council
|
« 調查日期 Date of Survey : 1-3/4/04 | 調查日期 Date of Survey : 2-5/7/04 » | |
||||
姓名 Name |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度變化 Difference in support rating |
行政長官辦公室主任林煥光 Director of Chief Executive's Office Lam Woon-kwong | 51.1 | 0.6 | 73.9% | 50.1 | 0.7 | 72.9% | -1.0 |
中央政策組首席顧問劉兆佳 Head of Central Policy Unit Lau Siu-kai | 46.5 | 0.7 | 76.9% | 45.3 | 0.7 | 77.0% | -1.2 |
評分變化:認知率未及五成者
Difference on Ratings: Those with recognition rates under 50%
|
« 調查日期 Date of Survey : 1-3/4/04 | 調查日期 Date of Survey : 2-5/7/04 » | |
||||
姓名 Name |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度 Support Rating |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
認知率 Recognition rate |
支持度變化 Difference in support rating |
行政會議非官方議員廖長城 Non-Official Member of Executive Council Liao Cheung-sing | * | * | * 41.6% | * | * | * 45.2% | * |
* 認知率不足五成者評分不能作準
Ratings with less than 50% recognition rates are not taken as representative