政改方案第四次民意調查 Fourth Public opinion survey on political reform返回
[Q1] 就香港特區行政長官選舉既路線圖同時間表，有意見認為應該係2012年直接成立提名委員會達至普選；又有意見認為應該要先經過一個過度期，再係2017年達至普選；仲有意見認為應該要先經過一個過度期，然後係2017年以後達至普選。你傾向支持三種意見裏面邊一種？( )
[Q1] On the roadmap and timetable for the universal suffrage of Chief Executive (CE) election, one of the opinions in society is to directly establish a nominating committee in 2012 to attain universal suffrage. Another opinion holds that a transitional phase shall be introduced before the actual implementation of universal suffrage in 2017. A third proposal is that Hong Kong is to undergo a transitional phase while universal suffrage should be attained after 2017. Of the above 3 opinions, which one are you more inclined to? ( )
調查日期 Date of survey |
在2012年直接成立提名委員會達至普選 To establish a nominating committee directly in 2012 to attain universal suffrage |
先經過一個過度期，在2017年達至普選 To go through a transitional phase and attain universal suffrage in 2017 |
先經過一個過度期，在2017年以後達至普選 To go through a transitional phase and attain universal suffrage after 2017 |
唔知／難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 37.2% | 32.3% | 19.7% | 10.9% | 100.0% |
[Q2] 假設2012年會直接成立提名委員會達至普選行政長官，有意見認為提名委員應該由少於800人組成；又有意見認為應該由800人組成；仲有意見認為應該由多於800人組成，例如將人數增加至1,200至1,600人。你傾向支持三種意見裏面邊一種？( )
[Q2] Assume that a nominating committee is to be set up directly to attain universal suffrage of CE in 2012, there is a view that the nominating committee should consist of less than 800 members. Another view holds that the nominating committee should be constituted by 800 members while a third view proposes a nominating committee with over 800 members, say to increase the number of members to between 1,200 to 1,600. Which of the above proposals are you more inclined to? ( )
調查日期 Date of survey |
提名委員會由少於800人組成 Nominating committee to be constituted by less than 800 members |
提名委員會由800人組成 Nominating committee to be constituted by 800 members |
提名委員會由多於800人組成 Nominating committee to be constituted by more than 800 members |
唔知／難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 7.7% | 17.0% | 65.7% | 9.7% | 100.0% |
[Q3] 就2012年行政長官選舉方面，有意見認為應該將現有既800人選舉委員會，加上約400名民選區議員，組成約1,200人既提名委員會，而50名委員可提名1位行政長官候選人，最後由市民一人一票選出行政長官。你有幾支持或者反對呢個方案？( )
[Q3] Regarding the Chief Executive election in 2012, it is proposed that 400 directly elected district councilors should be added to the existing 800-member Election Committee, adding up to a total of approximately 1,200 committee members. The number of subscribers required should be 50 regardless of the sector they belong to. The Chief Executive should ultimately be elected by universal suffrage. Do you support or oppose this proposal? ( )
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
非常支持 Very Support |
幾支持 Quite Support |
一半半／一般 Half-half |
幾反對 Quite Oppose |
非常反對 Very Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 16.5% | 39.6% | 20.3% | 10.5% | 4.4% | 8.8% | 100.0% |
| 3-6/7/2007 | 13.1% | 35.8% | 19.8% | 10.6% | 9.2% | 11.6% | 100.0% |
| 18-22/6/2007 | 21.5% | 35.0% | 16.9% | 8.2% | 5.9% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
| 1-7/6/2007 | 18.7% | 33.0% | 21.7% | 10.3% | 6.3% | 9.9% | 100.0% |
組合數據 Collapsed data
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
支持 Support |
一半半／一般 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 56.1% | 20.3% | 14.8% | 8.8% | 100.0% |
| 3-6/7/2007 | 48.9% | 19.8% | 19.8% | 11.6% | 100.0% |
| 18-22/6/2007 | 56.5% | 16.9% | 14.1% | 12.6% | 100.0% |
| 1-7/6/2007 | 51.8% | 21.7% | 16.6% | 9.9% | 100.0% |
[Q4] 有意見認為行政長官選舉應該加入一 D預先篩選機制，確保中央政府能夠接受候選人，但又有意見認為基本法已經規定行政長官由中央政府任命，同埋要對中央政府負責，已經確保中央政府能夠接受候選人，因此不應該加入預先篩選機制。你傾向認同邊種講法多D？( )
[Q4] It is proposed that a sort of prior vetting mechanism should be added to the Chief Executive election to secure the acceptance of candidates by the Central government. However, some holds another view that no prior vetting mechanism should be introduced as the Basic Law has already stipulated that CE had to be appointed by and is responsible to the Central government, securing Central Government's endorsement of the candidates. Which view are you more inclined to? ( )
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
傾向認同應該加入預先篩選機制 Inclined to adding some prior vetting mechanism |
傾向認同不應該加入預先篩選機制 Inclined not to introducing prior vetting mechanism |
兩者都認同 Agree to both |
兩者都不認同 Neither of them |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 43.7% | 41.9% | 1.2% | 2.6% | 10.6% | 100.0% |
[Q5] 就香港特區立法會普選既路線圖同時間表，有意見認為應該係2012年達至普選；又有意見認為分階段係2016年達至普選；仲有意見認為應該分階段係2016年以後達至普選。你傾向支持三種意見裏面邊一種？( )
[Q5] On the roadmap and timetable for the universal suffrage of the Legislative Council (LegCo), there is opinion that universal suffrage should be attained in 2012 while another view holds that it should be attained in phases in 2016. A third view proposes attaining universal suffrage in phases after 2016. Which view are you more inclined to? ( )
調查日期 Date of survey |
在2012年達至普選 Attaining universal suffrage in 2012 |
分階段在2016年達至普選 Attaining universal suffrage in phases in 2016 |
分階段在2016年以後達至普選 Attaining universal suffrage in phases after 2016 |
唔知／難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 41.6% | 30.6% | 19.0% | 8.8% | 100.0% |
[Q6] 假設2012年會普選立法會，有意見認為應該由地區直選議席取代功能界別議席；又有意見認為應該保留功能界別議席，但改變選舉模式；仲有意見認為應該增加區議會在立法會既議席數目。你傾向支持三種意見裏面邊一種？( )
[Q6] Assume that universal suffrage of the LegCo is to be attained in 2012, there is a view that functional constituency (FC) seats shall be replaced by district-based seats returned through direct election. Another proposal suggests the retaining of FC seats but changing its electoral method. A third proposal is to increase the number of seats representing District Councils in LegCo. Which view are you more inclined to? ( )
調查日期 Date of survey |
由地區直選議席取代功能界別議席 Replacing FC seats by district-based seats returned through direct election |
保留功能界別議席，但改變選舉模式 Retaining FC seats but changing the electoral method |
增加區議會在立法會既議席數目 Increasing the number of seats representing District Councils in LegCo |
唔知／難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 22.9% | 33.6% | 27.5% | 16.0% | 100.0% |
[Q7] 就2012年立法會選舉方面，有意見認為應該採用混合選舉模式，一半議席由單議席單票以簡單多數制產生，另一半議席則由全港單一選區按比例代表制產生，每名市民可以投兩票。你有幾支持或者反對呢個方案？()
[Q7] Regarding the Legislative Council election in 2012, it is proposed that a mixed election model would be adopted, whereby half of the seats would be returned by a "single seat single vote" simple majority system. The other half of the seats would be returned through elections by the "proportional representation system" so that each voter can cast two votes. Do you support or oppose this proposal? (
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
非常支持 Very Support |
幾支持 Quite Support |
一半半／一般 Half-half |
幾反對 Quite Oppose |
非常反對 Very Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 11.5% | 36.4% | 18.3% | 14.3% | 6.9% | 12.7% | 100.0% |
| 3-6/7/2007 | 10.1% | 37.6% | 18.7% | 12.6% | 6.6% | 14.4% | 100.0% |
| 18-22/6/2007 | 8.7% | 36.5% | 17.7% | 10.0% | 5.3% | 21.9% | 100.0% |
| 1-7/6/2007 | 9.6% | 29.9% | 21.2% | 15.8% | 4.7% | 18.8% | 100.0% |
組合數據 Collapsed data
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
支持 Support |
一半半／一般 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
合計 Total |
| 23-26/7/2007 | 47.9% | 18.3% | 21.1% | 12.7% | 100.0% |
| 3-6/7/2007 | 47.8% | 18.7% | 19.1% | 14.4% | 100.0% |
| 18-22/6/2007 | 45.2% | 17.7% | 15.3% | 21.9% | 100.0% |
| 1-7/6/2007 | 39.5% | 21.2% | 20.5% | 18.8% | 100.0% |
