市民對梁振英第四份施政報告之首輪跟進調查 Follow-up Survey on the Fourth Policy Address of Leung Chun-ying返回
14-15/1/2016 (首輪跟進調查)
14-15/1/2016 (First follow-up Survey)
整體黎講，你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告滿唔滿意呢？#
How satisfied are you with Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's Policy Address ?#
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
非常滿意 Very satisfied |
幾滿意 Quite satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied |
非常不滿 Very dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
平均量值** Mean value** |
基數 Base |
樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 513 | 6.3% | 10.4% | 18.2% | 20.1% | 33.1% | 12.0% | 2.3 | 451 | 0.1 | -36.6% |
| 13/1/2016 | 即日調查 Instant survey | 522 | 5.0% | 14.1% | 22.9% | 16.2% | 22.8% | 19.0% | 2.5 | 423 | 0.1 | -19.9% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 500 | 5.1% | 14.7% | 26.1% | 18.7% | 28.2% | 7.1% | 2.5 | 465 | 0.1 | -27.1% |
| 14/1/2015 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 503* | 6.0% | 24.5% | 23.6% | 19.1% | 16.1% | 10.8% | 2.8 | 449 | 0.1 | -4.8% |
| 28-29/1/2014 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 516 | 3.3% | 23.2% | 26.8% | 23.7% | 13.4% | 9.6% | 2.8 | 466 | 0.1 | -10.6% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 518 | 3.0% | 20.2% | 27.9% | 23.1% | 18.2% | 7.5% | 2.6 | 479 | 0.1 | -18.1% |
| 15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 611* | 6.6% | 29.6% | 29.9% | 20.0% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 3.0 | 593 | 0.1 | 5.2% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 506 | 2.4% | 19.4% | 28.9% | 24.0% | 20.7% | 4.7% | 2.6 | 482 | 0.1 | -23.0% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 530 | 4.4% | 22.4% | 25.7% | 26.1% | 13.3% | 8.1% | 2.8 | 487 | 0.1 | -12.5% |
| 16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 759* | 7.2% | 28.6% | 34.5% | 15.9% | 8.5% | 5.5% | 3.1 | 717 | 0.1 | 11.4% |
** 平均量值是把所有答案按照正面程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
組合數據 Collapsed data
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 513 | 16.6% | 18.2% | 53.2% | 12.0% | -36.6% |
| 13/1/2016 | 即日調查 Instant survey | 522 | 19.1% | 22.9% | 39.0% | 19.0% | -19.9% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 500 | 19.9% | 26.1% | 46.9% | 7.1% | -27.1% |
| 14/1/2015 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 503* | 30.4% | 23.6% | 35.2% | 10.8% | -4.8% |
| 28-29/1/2014 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 516 | 26.5% | 26.8% | 37.1% | 9.6% | -10.6% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 518 | 23.2% | 27.9% | 41.4% | 7.5% | -18.1% |
| 15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 611* | 36.2% | 29.9% | 31.0% | 2.9% | 5.2% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 506 | 21.8% | 28.9% | 44.7% | 4.7% | -23.0% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 530 | 26.9% | 25.7% | 39.3% | 8.1% | -12.5% |
| 16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 759* | 35.7% | 34.5% | 24.3% | 5.5% | 11.4% |
再撇除沒有意見者 Those without opinion further excluded
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
基數 Base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 451 | 18.9% | 20.6% | 60.5% | -41.5% |
| 13/1/2016 | 即日調查 Instant survey | 423 | 23.6% | 28.2% | 48.2% | -24.6% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 465 | 21.4% | 28.1% | 50.5% | -29.1% |
| 14/1/2015 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 449* | 34.1% | 26.4% | 39.5% | -5.4% |
| 28-29/1/2014 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 466 | 29.3% | 29.6% | 41.1% | -11.8% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 479 | 25.1% | 30.1% | 44.7% | -19.6% |
| 15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 593* | 37.2% | 30.8% | 31.9% | 5.3% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 482 | 22.8% | 30.3% | 46.9% | -24.1% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 487 | 29.2% | 27.9% | 42.8% | -13.6% |
| 16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 717* | 37.8% | 36.5% | 25.7% | 12.1% |
宜家想請你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告既滿意程度進行評分,0分代表非常不滿，100分代表非常滿意，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分今年既施政報告呢？ #
Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your degree of satisfaction of the policy address delivered by Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying today, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied, 100 indicating very satisfied and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate his latest Policy Address?#
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
評分 Ratings |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
樣本人數 Total Sample |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 37.5 | 1.3 | 514 | 484 | 94.2% |
| 13/1/2016 | 即日調查 Instant survey | 41.1 | 1.3 | 608 | 450 | 74.0% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 43.4 | 1.2 | 500 | 480 | 96.0% |
| 14/1/2015 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 49.5 | 1.2 | 640 | 472 | 73.8% |
| 28-29/1/2014 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 48.1 | 1.0 | 516 | 484 | 93.7% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 48.1 | 1.0 | 519 | 485 | 93.5% |
| 15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 54.1 | 1.0 | 1017 | 602 | 59.2% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 43.8 | 1.0 | 506 | 489 | 96.7% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 48.2 | 1.0 | 530 | 500 | 94.4% |
| 16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 56.4 | 0.8 | 759 | 722 | 95.1% |
整體黎講你對梁振英既施政方針滿唔滿意？#
On the whole, how satisfied are you with Leung Chun-ying's policy direction?#
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
非常滿意 Very satisfied |
幾滿意 Quite satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied |
非常不滿 Very dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
平均量值** Mean value** |
基數 Base |
樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 512 | 5.9% | 16.5% | 18.9% | 21.5% | 32.3% | 4.8% | 2.4 | 487 | 0.1 | -31.5% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 500 | 5.0% | 19.5% | 20.1% | 24.5% | 27.5% | 3.4% | 2.5 | 483 | 0.1 | -27.5% |
| 28-29/1/2014 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 516 | 3.6% | 28.0% | 23.3% | 26.2% | 13.1% | 5.8% | 2.8 | 486 | 0.1 | -7.6% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 3.6% | 25.6% | 23.4% | 22.4% | 19.3% | 5.8% | 2.7 | 489 | 0.1 | -12.4% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 505 | 3.0% | 26.1% | 28.1% | 24.5% | 15.0% | 3.4% | 2.8 | 488 | 0.1 | -10.3% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 529 | 4.9% | 29.9% | 25.6% | 21.1% | 11.3% | 7.2% | 3.0 | 491 | 0.1 | 2.4% |
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
組合數據 Collapsed data
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 512 | 22.4% | 18.9% | 53.9% | 4.8% | -31.5% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 500 | 24.5% | 20.1% | 52.0% | 3.4% | -27.5% |
| 28-29/1/2014 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 516 | 31.6% | 23.3% | 39.3% | 5.8% | -7.6% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 29.2% | 23.4% | 41.6% | 5.8% | -12.4% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 505 | 29.1% | 28.1% | 39.4% | 3.4% | -10.3% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 529 | 34.8% | 25.6% | 32.4% | 7.2% | 2.4% |
今年施政報告既主題係「XXXX」，你認為呢個主題是否切合社會需要？
The theme of this year's Policy Address is 「XXXX」. Do you think this theme concurs with the current needs of the society?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
是 Yes |
一半半 Half-half |
否 No |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 512 | 47.0% | 14.7% | 33.4% | 4.9% | 13.6% |
| 15-16/1/2015 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 497 | 54.4% | 14.4% | 28.1% | 3.0% | 26.2% |
| 16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 55.6% | 17.3% | 22.2% | 4.9% | 33.5% |
| 22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 505 | 47.7% | 14.5% | 32.2% | 5.6% | 15.5% |
| 17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 526 | 53.2% | 11.6% | 26.8% | 8.4% | 26.4% |
2015年施政報告既主題係「重法治、掌機遇、作抉擇，推進民主、發展經濟、改善民生」 The theme of 2015 Policy Address is “Uphold the Rule of Law Seize the Opportunities Make the Right Choices Pursue Democracy Boost the Economy Improve People’s Livelihood”
2014年施政報告既主題係「讓有需要的 得到支援 讓年青的 各展所長 讓香港得以發揮」 The theme of 2014 Policy Address is “Support the Needy Let Youth Flourish Unleash Hong Kong’s Potential”
2013年施政報告既主題係「穩中求變 務實為民」 The theme of 2013 Policy Address is 「Seek Change Maintain Stability Serve the People with Pragmatism」
你認為梁振英係施政報告提出既各項政策，對解決香港現時遇到既問題效用屬於大定細？
Do you think the effect of the policies proposed by CY Leung in Policy Address on tackling the current problems in Hong Kong would be big or small?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
效用大 Large |
一半半 Half-half |
效用細(包括冇效用) Small |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 514 | 11.0% | 16.6% | 62.5% | 9.9% | -51.4% |
你認為梁振英提出既房屋及土地供應政策，對解決房屋問題既效用屬於大定細？
Do you think the effect of the housing and land supply policies proposed by CY Leung on tackling housing problems would be big or small?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
贊成 Support |
一半半 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 512 | 22.7% | 19.0% | 51.5% | 6.8% | -28.8% |
梁振英亦表示政府將成立「一帶一路」督導委員會，負責制定香港參與「一帶一路」既策略和政策，並設立「一帶一路」辦公室，負責推動研究工作。另外又會設立10億元獎學金，鼓勵更多「一帶一路」國家既學生來港升學。你贊成定反對呢D做法？
CY Leung also said that the Government will set up a steering committee for the Belt and Road, which will be responsible for formulating strategies and policies for Hong Kong’s participation in the Belt and Road Initiative. A Belt and Road Office will also be established to take forward related studies. Besides, a $1 billion scholarship fund will be set up to attract more students from the Belt and Road countries to study in Hong Kong. Do you support or oppose these proposals?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
效用大 Large |
一半半 Half-half |
效用細(包括冇效用) Small |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 514 | 20.8% | 8.9% | 60.2% | 10.1% | -39.4% |
梁振英就「創新及科技」提出多項政策，包括預留20億元予創科局，用投資收入資助院校進行研究、分別成立創科創投基金及創科生活基金、發展「智慧城市」等。你贊成定反對呢D做法？
CY Leung proposed several policies regarding “Innovation and Technology”, including earmarking $2 billion to the ITB so that investment income generated from the allocation can be used to fund research undertaken by institutions; setting up the Innovation and Technology Venture Fund and the Innovation and Technology Fund for Better Living respectively; developing a “smart city”, etc. Do you support or oppose these proposals?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
效用大 Large |
一半半 Half-half |
效用細(包括冇效用) Small |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 512 | 44.1% | 13.1% | 31.1% | 11.7% | 13.0% |
有意見認為今年施政報告傾向用中央政府角度解決香港社會問題，多過用市民角度解決問題，你贊成定反對呢個講法？
There is a saying that this year’s Policy Address tends to address social problems in Hong Kong from the perspective of the Central Government rather than from citizens’ perspective. Do you support or oppose this view?
| 調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
贊成 Support |
一半半 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
| 14-15/1/2016 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 509 | 58.4% | 9.6% | 22.6% | 9.4% | 35.8% |
# 2014年起，民研計劃把以往按照年齡及性別分佈進行的簡單加權方法，改良成為按照年齡、性別及教育程度（最高就讀程度）分佈的「反覆多重加權」方法調整數據 From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution
