市民對梁振英第四份施政報告之次輪跟進調查 Second Follow-up Survey on the Fourth Policy Address of Leung Chun-ying返回


1-2/2/2016 (次輪跟進調查)
1-2/2/2016 (Second follow-up Survey)

整體黎講，你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告滿唔滿意呢？#
How satisfied are you with Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's Policy Address ?#
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		本題基數
Sub-sample base		 非常滿意
Very satisfied		 幾滿意
Quite satisfied		 一半半
Half-half		 幾唔滿意
Not quite satisfied		 非常不滿
Very dissatisfied		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 平均量值**
Mean value**		 基數
Base		 樣本平均標準誤差
Standard Error of Mean		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 2.7% 15.3% 17.0% 23.6% 30.7% 10.6% 2.3 460 0.1 -36.3%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 513 6.3% 10.4% 18.2% 20.1% 33.1% 12.0% 2.3 451 0.1 -36.6%
13/1/2016 即日調查 Instant survey 522 5.0% 14.1% 22.9% 16.2% 22.8% 19.0% 2.5 423 0.1 -19.9%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 500 5.1% 14.7% 26.1% 18.7% 28.2% 7.1% 2.5 465 0.1 -27.1%
14/1/2015 即時調查 Instant survey 503* 6.0% 24.5% 23.6% 19.1% 16.1% 10.8% 2.8 449 0.1 -4.8%
28-29/1/2014 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 516 3.3% 23.2% 26.8% 23.7% 13.4% 9.6% 2.8 466 0.1 -10.6%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 518 3.0% 20.2% 27.9% 23.1% 18.2% 7.5% 2.6 479 0.1 -18.1%
15/1/2014 即時調查 Instant survey 611* 6.6% 29.6% 29.9% 20.0% 11.1% 2.9% 3.0 593 0.1 5.2%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 506 2.4% 19.4% 28.9% 24.0% 20.7% 4.7% 2.6 482 0.1 -23.0%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 530 4.4% 22.4% 25.7% 26.1% 13.3% 8.1% 2.8 487 0.1 -12.5%
16/1/2013 即時調查 Instant survey 759* 7.2% 28.6% 34.5% 15.9% 8.5% 5.5% 3.1 717 0.1 11.4%
* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address
** 平均量值是把所有答案按照正面程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.

組合數據 Collapsed data
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		本題基數
Sub-sample base		 滿意
Satisfied		 一半半
Half-half		 不滿
Dissatisfied		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 18.0% 17.0% 54.3% 10.6% -36.3%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 513 16.6% 18.2% 53.2% 12.0% -36.6%
13/1/2016 即日調查 Instant survey 522 19.1% 22.9% 39.0% 19.0% -19.9%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 500 19.9% 26.1% 46.9% 7.1% -27.1%
14/1/2015 即時調查 Instant survey 503* 30.4% 23.6% 35.2% 10.8% -4.8%
28-29/1/2014 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 516 26.5% 26.8% 37.1% 9.6% -10.6%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 518 23.2% 27.9% 41.4% 7.5% -18.1%
15/1/2014 即時調查 Instant survey 611* 36.2% 29.9% 31.0% 2.9% 5.2%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 506 21.8% 28.9% 44.7% 4.7% -23.0%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 530 26.9% 25.7% 39.3% 8.1% -12.5%
16/1/2013 即時調查 Instant survey 759* 35.7% 34.5% 24.3% 5.5% 11.4%
* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address

再撇除沒有意見者 Those without opinion further excluded
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		基數
Base		 滿意
Satisfied		 一半半
Half-half		 不滿
Dissatisfied		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 460 20.1% 19.1% 60.8% -40.6%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 451 18.9% 20.6% 60.5% -41.5%
13/1/2016 即日調查 Instant survey 423 23.6% 28.2% 48.2% -24.6%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 465 21.4% 28.1% 50.5% -29.1%
14/1/2015 即時調查 Instant survey 449* 34.1% 26.4% 39.5% -5.4%
28-29/1/2014 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 466 29.3% 29.6% 41.1% -11.8%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 479 25.1% 30.1% 44.7% -19.6%
15/1/2014 即時調查 Instant survey 593* 37.2% 30.8% 31.9% 5.3%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 482 22.8% 30.3% 46.9% -24.1%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 487 29.2% 27.9% 42.8% -13.6%
16/1/2013 即時調查 Instant survey 717* 37.8% 36.5% 25.7% 12.1%
* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address


宜家想請你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告既滿意程度進行評分,0分代表非常不滿，100分代表非常滿意，50分代表一半半，你會俾幾多分今年既施政報告呢？ #
Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your degree of satisfaction of the policy address delivered by Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying today, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied, 100 indicating very satisfied and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate his latest Policy Address?#
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		評分
Ratings		 標準誤差
Standard Error		 樣本人數
Total Sample		 評分人數
Number of Raters		 認知率
Recognition Rate
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 39.7 1.2 515 486 94.3%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 37.5 1.3 514 484 94.2%
13/1/2016 即日調查 Instant survey 41.1 1.3 608 450 74.0%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 43.4 1.2 500 480 96.0%
14/1/2015 即時調查 Instant survey 49.5 1.2 640 472 73.8%
28-29/1/2014 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 48.1 1.0 516 484 93.7%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 48.1 1.0 519 485 93.5%
15/1/2014 即時調查 Instant survey 54.1 1.0 1017 602 59.2%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 43.8 1.0 506 489 96.7%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 48.2 1.0 530 500 94.4%
16/1/2013 即時調查 Instant survey 56.4 0.8 759 722 95.1%
* 撇除未聞施政報告數字 Excluding those who had not heard of the Policy Address


整體黎講你對梁振英既施政方針滿唔滿意？#
On the whole, how satisfied are you with Leung Chun-ying's policy direction?#
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		本題基數
Sub-sample base		 非常滿意
Very satisfied		 幾滿意
Quite satisfied		 一半半
Half-half		 幾唔滿意
Not quite satisfied		 非常不滿
Very dissatisfied		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 平均量值**
Mean value**		 基數
Base		 樣本平均標準誤差
Standard Error of Mean		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 4.4% 20.1% 16.8% 23.3% 30.0% 5.3% 2.4 487 0.1 -28.7%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 512 5.9% 16.5% 18.9% 21.5% 32.3% 4.8% 2.4 487 0.1 -31.5%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 500 5.0% 19.5% 20.1% 24.5% 27.5% 3.4% 2.5 483 0.1 -27.5%
28-29/1/2014 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 516 3.6% 28.0% 23.3% 26.2% 13.1% 5.8% 2.8 486 0.1 -7.6%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 519 3.6% 25.6% 23.4% 22.4% 19.3% 5.8% 2.7 489 0.1 -12.4%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 505 3.0% 26.1% 28.1% 24.5% 15.0% 3.4% 2.8 488 0.1 -10.3%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 529 4.9% 29.9% 25.6% 21.1% 11.3% 7.2% 3.0 491 0.1 2.4%
** 平均量值是把所有答案按照正面程度，以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分，再求取樣本平均數值。
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.

組合數據 Collapsed data
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		本題基數
Sub-sample base		 滿意
Satisfied		 一半半
Half-half		 不滿
Dissatisfied		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 24.6% 16.8% 53.2% 5.3% -28.7%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 512 22.4% 18.9% 53.9% 4.8% -31.5%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 500 24.5% 20.1% 52.0% 3.4% -27.5%
28-29/1/2014 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 516 31.6% 23.3% 39.3% 5.8% -7.6%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 519 29.2% 23.4% 41.6% 5.8% -12.4%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 505 29.1% 28.1% 39.4% 3.4% -10.3%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 529 34.8% 25.6% 32.4% 7.2% 2.4%



今年施政報告既主題係「XXXX」，你認為呢個主題是否切合社會需要？
The theme of this year's Policy Address is 「XXXX」. Do you think this theme concurs with the current needs of the society?
調查日期
Date of survey		 即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey 		本題基數
Sub-sample base		 是
Yes		 一半半
Half-half		 否
No		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 54.5% 12.3% 30.6% 2.6% 23.9%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 512 47.0% 14.7% 33.4% 4.9% 13.6%
15-16/1/2015 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 497 54.4% 14.4% 28.1% 3.0% 26.2%
16-17/1/2014 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 519 55.6% 17.3% 22.2% 4.9% 33.5%
22-24/1/2013 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 505 47.7% 14.5% 32.2% 5.6% 15.5%
17-18/1/2013 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 526 53.2% 11.6% 26.8% 8.4% 26.4%
2016年施政報告既主題係「創新經濟、改善民生、促進和諧，繁榮共享」 The theme of 2016 Policy Address is "Innovate for the Economy, Improve Livelihood, Foster Harmony, Share Prosperity"
2015年施政報告既主題係「重法治、掌機遇、作抉擇，推進民主、發展經濟、改善民生」 The theme of 2015 Policy Address is “Uphold the Rule of Law Seize the Opportunities Make the Right Choices Pursue Democracy Boost the Economy Improve People’s Livelihood”
2014年施政報告既主題係「讓有需要的 得到支援 讓年青的 各展所長 讓香港得以發揮」 The theme of 2014 Policy Address is “Support the Needy Let Youth Flourish Unleash Hong Kong’s Potential”
2013年施政報告既主題係「穩中求變 務實為民」 The theme of 2013 Policy Address is 「Seek Change Maintain Stability Serve the People with Pragmatism」


你認為梁振英係施政報告提出既各項政策，對解決香港現時遇到既問題效用屬於大定細？
Do you think the effect of the policies proposed by CY Leung in Policy Address on tackling the current problems in Hong Kong would be big or small?
調查日期
Date of survey		 首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
First follow-up/Second follow-up survey		 本題基數
Sub-sample base		 效用大
Large		 一半半
Half-half		 效用細(包括冇效用)
Small		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 10.0% 16.1% 64.5% 9.4% -54.5%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 514 11.0% 16.6% 62.5% 9.9% -51.4%


你認為梁振英提出既房屋及土地供應政策，對解決房屋問題既效用屬於大定細？
Do you think the effect of the housing and land supply policies proposed by CY Leung on tackling housing problems would be big or small?
調查日期
Date of survey		 首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
First follow-up/Second follow-up survey		 本題基數
Sub-sample base		 贊成
Support		 一半半
Half-half		 反對
Oppose		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 19.6% 21.8% 53.6% 4.9% -34.1%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 512 22.7% 19.0% 51.5% 6.8% -28.8%


梁振英亦表示政府將成立「一帶一路」督導委員會，負責制定香港參與「一帶一路」既策略和政策，並設立「一帶一路」辦公室，負責推動研究工作。另外又會設立10億元獎學金，鼓勵更多「一帶一路」國家既學生來港升學。你贊成定反對呢D做法？
CY Leung also said that the Government will set up a steering committee for the Belt and Road, which will be responsible for formulating strategies and policies for Hong Kong’s participation in the Belt and Road Initiative. A Belt and Road Office will also be established to take forward related studies. Besides, a $1 billion scholarship fund will be set up to attract more students from the Belt and Road countries to study in Hong Kong. Do you support or oppose these proposals?
調查日期
Date of survey		 首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
First follow-up/Second follow-up survey		 本題基數
Sub-sample base		 效用大
Large		 一半半
Half-half		 效用細(包括冇效用)
Small		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 514 24.8% 8.9% 60.5% 5.8% -35.7%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 514 20.8% 8.9% 60.2% 10.1% -39.4%


梁振英就「創新及科技」提出多項政策，包括預留20億元予創科局，用投資收入資助院校進行研究、分別成立創科創投基金及創科生活基金、發展「智慧城市」等。你贊成定反對呢D做法？
CY Leung proposed several policies regarding “Innovation and Technology”, including earmarking $2 billion to the ITB so that investment income generated from the allocation can be used to fund research undertaken by institutions; setting up the Innovation and Technology Venture Fund and the Innovation and Technology Fund for Better Living respectively; developing a “smart city”, etc. Do you support or oppose these proposals?
調查日期
Date of survey		 首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
First follow-up/Second follow-up survey		 本題基數
Sub-sample base		 效用大
Large		 一半半
Half-half		 效用細(包括冇效用)
Small		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 514 50.2% 10.6% 28.3% 11.0% 21.9%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 512 44.1% 13.1% 31.1% 11.7% 13.0%


有意見認為今年施政報告傾向用中央政府角度解決香港社會問題，多過用市民角度解決問題，你贊成定反對呢個講法？
There is a saying that this year’s Policy Address tends to address social problems in Hong Kong from the perspective of the Central Government rather than from citizens’ perspective. Do you support or oppose this view?
調查日期
Date of survey		 首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查
First follow-up/Second follow-up survey		 本題基數
Sub-sample base		 贊成
Support		 一半半
Half-half		 反對
Oppose		 唔知/難講
DK/HS		 淨值
Net Value
1-2/2/2016 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey 515 59.7% 9.9% 23.7% 6.7% 36.0%
14-15/1/2016 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey 509 58.4% 9.6% 22.6% 9.4% 35.8%


# 2014年起，民研計劃把以往按照年齡及性別分佈進行的簡單加權方法，改良成為按照年齡、性別及教育程度（最高就讀程度）分佈的「反覆多重加權」方法調整數據 From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution