市民對梁振英第二份施政報告之首輪跟進調查 Follow-up Survey on the Second Policy Address of Leung Chun-ying返回
16-17/1/2014 (首輪跟進調查)
16-17/1/2014 (First follow-up Survey)
整體黎講,你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告滿唔滿意呢?#
How satisfied are you with Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's Policy Address ?#
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
非常滿意 Very satisfied |
幾滿意 Quite satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied |
非常不滿 Very dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
平均量值** Mean value** |
基數 Base |
樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 518 | 3.0% | 20.2% | 27.9% | 23.1% | 18.2% | 7.5% | 2.6 | 479 | 0.1 | -18.1% |
15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 611* | 6.6% | 29.6% | 29.9% | 20.0% | 11.1% | 2.9% | 3.0 | 593 | 0.1 | 5.2% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 506 | 2.4% | 19.4% | 28.9% | 24.0% | 20.7% | 4.7% | 2.6 | 482 | 0.1 | -23.0% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 530 | 4.4% | 22.4% | 25.7% | 26.1% | 13.3% | 8.1% | 2.8 | 487 | 0.1 | -12.5% |
16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 759* | 7.2% | 28.6% | 34.5% | 15.9% | 8.5% | 5.5% | 3.1 | 717 | 0.1 | 11.4% |
** 平均量值是把所有答案按照正面程度,以1分最低5分最高量化成為1、2、3、4、5分,再求取樣本平均數值。
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
組合數據 Collapsed data
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 518 | 23.2% | 27.9% | 41.4% | 7.5% | -18.1% |
15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 611* | 36.2% | 29.9% | 31.0% | 2.9% | 5.2% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 506 | 21.8% | 28.9% | 44.7% | 4.7% | -23.0% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 530 | 26.9% | 25.7% | 39.3% | 8.1% | -12.5% |
16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 759* | 35.7% | 34.5% | 24.3% | 5.5% | 11.4% |
再撇除沒有意見者 Those without opinion further excluded
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
基數 Base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 479 | 25.1% | 30.1% | 44.7% | -19.6% |
15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 593* | 37.2% | 30.8% | 31.9% | 5.3% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 482 | 22.8% | 30.3% | 46.9% | -24.1% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 487 | 29.2% | 27.9% | 42.8% | -13.6% |
16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 717* | 37.8% | 36.5% | 25.7% | 12.1% |
宜家想請你對特首梁振英今年既施政報告既滿意程度進行評分,0分代表非常不滿,100分代表非常滿意,50分代表一半半,你會俾幾多分今年既施政報告呢? #
Please use a scale of 0-100 to rate your degree of satisfaction of the policy address delivered by Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying today, with 0 indicating very dissatisfied, 100 indicating very satisfied and 50 indicating half-half. How would you rate his latest Policy Address?#
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
評分 Ratings |
標準誤差 Standard Error |
樣本人數 Total Sample |
評分人數 Number of Raters |
認知率 Recognition Rate |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 48.1 | 1.0 | 519 | 485 | 93.5% |
15/1/2014 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 54.1 | 1.0 | 1017 | 602 | 59.2% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 43.8 | 1.0 | 506 | 489 | 96.7% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 48.2 | 1.0 | 530 | 500 | 94.4% |
16/1/2013 | 即時調查 Instant survey | 56.4 | 0.8 | 759 | 722 | 95.1% |
整體黎講你對梁振英既施政方針滿唔滿意?#
On the whole, how satisfied are you with Leung Chun-ying's policy direction?#
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
非常滿意 Very satisfied |
幾滿意 Quite satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
幾唔滿意 Not quite satisfied |
非常不滿 Very dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
平均量值** Mean value** |
基數 Base |
樣本平均標準誤差 Standard Error of Mean |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 3.6% | 25.6% | 23.4% | 22.4% | 19.3% | 5.8% | 2.7 | 489 | 0.1 | -12.4% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 505 | 3.0% | 26.1% | 28.1% | 24.5% | 15.0% | 3.4% | 2.8 | 488 | 0.1 | -10.3% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 529 | 4.9% | 29.9% | 25.6% | 21.1% | 11.3% | 7.2% | 3.0 | 491 | 0.1 | 2.4% |
** The mean value is calculated by quantifying all individual responses into 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 marks according to their degree of positive level, where 1 is the lowest and 5 the highest, and then calculate the sample mean.
組合數據 Collapsed data
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
滿意 Satisfied |
一半半 Half-half |
不滿 Dissatisfied |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 29.2% | 23.4% | 41.6% | 5.8% | -12.4% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 505 | 29.1% | 28.1% | 39.4% | 3.4% | -10.3% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 529 | 34.8% | 25.6% | 32.4% | 7.2% | 2.4% |
今年施政報告既主題係「XXXX」,你認為呢個主題是否切合社會需要?
The theme of this year's Policy Address is 「XXXX」. Do you think this theme concurs with the current needs of the society?
調查日期 Date of survey |
即時/首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 Instant/First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
是 Yes |
一半半 Half-half |
否 No |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 55.6% | 17.3% | 22.2% | 4.9% | 33.5% |
22-24/1/2013 | 次輪跟進調查 Second follow-up survey | 505 | 47.7% | 14.5% | 32.2% | 5.6% | 15.5% |
17-18/1/2013 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 526 | 53.2% | 11.6% | 26.8% | 8.4% | 26.4% |
2013年施政報告既主題係「穩中求變 務實為民」 The theme of 2013 Policy Address is 「Seek Change Maintain Stability Serve the People with Pragmatism」
梁振英提出設立「低收入在職家庭津貼」,以補貼無領取綜援既貧窮在職家庭,基本津貼由300至1,000元,而供養子女人士可獲發額外津貼,預計每年開支約為30億元;你贊成定反對呢個做法?
CY Leung proposed to introduce a Low-income Working Family Allowance, to assist non-CSSA working families living below the poverty line. The basic allowance is from $300 to $1,000, and those taking care of children are entitled to an additional allowance. Do you support or oppose this proposal?
調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
贊成 Support |
一半半 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 519 | 62.2% | 8.4% | 24.8% | 4.5% | 37.3% |
梁振英提出未來十年供應47萬個單位既建屋目標,當中公營房屋佔六成,你贊成定反對呢個做法?
CY Leung proposed that the new housing target is to provide a total of 470,000 units in the coming ten years, with public housing accounting for 60%. Do you support or oppose this proposal?
調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
贊成 Support |
一半半 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 517 | 75.6% | 7.6% | 13.4% | 3.4% | 62.2% |
梁振英提出發展大嶼山東部及鄰近地區,包括研究填海及建造人工島,以打造「東大嶼都會」作為新既核心商業區;你贊成定反對呢個做法?
CY Leung proposed to develop the eastern of Lantau Island and neighbouring areas, including studies on reclamation and artificial islands, with a view to developing an East Lantau Metropolis as a new core business district. Do you support or oppose this proposal?
調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
贊成 Support |
一半半 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 516 | 48.4% | 6.7% | 35.5% | 9.4% | 12.9% |
有意見認為今年施政報告忽視中產,你贊成定反對呢個講法?
There are concerns that the middle class is ignored in the policy address. Do you support or oppose this view?
調查日期 Date of survey |
首輪跟進/次輪跟進調查 First follow-up/Second follow-up survey |
本題基數 Sub-sample base |
贊成 Support |
一半半 Half-half |
反對 Oppose |
唔知/難講 DK/HS |
淨值 Net Value |
16-17/1/2014 | 首輪跟進調查 First follow-up survey | 518 | 70.2% | 5.6% | 15.3% | 9.0% | 55.0% |
# 2014年起,民研計劃把以往按照年齡及性別分佈進行的簡單加權方法,改良成為按照年齡、性別及教育程度(最高就讀程度)分佈的「反覆多重加權」方法調整數據 From 2014, POP enhanced the previous simple weighting method based on age and gender distribution to “rim weighting” based on age, gender and education (highest level attended) distribution