Frequency Tables返回

Table 1a [Q1] In the course of constitutional reform, how important do you think it is to safeguard the interest of the accountants?

	Frequency		Percentage
Very important	111	)	38.0	)
Quite important	74	) 185	25.3	) 63.4
Half-half	62		21.2
Not quite important	31	)	10.6	)
Not important at all	14	) 45	4.8	) 15.4
Total	292		100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	7

Table 1b [Q1] In the course of constitutional reform, how important do you think it is to safeguard the interest of the professionals?

	Frequency		Percentage
Very important	110	)	37.7	)
Quite important	87	) 197	37.7	) 67.5
Half-half	57		19.5
Not quite important	23	)	7.9	)
Not important at all	15	) 38	5.1	) 13.0
Total	292		100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	7

Table 1c [Q1] In the course of constitutional reform, how important do you think it is to safeguard the interest of the grassroots?

	Frequency		Percentage
Very important	122	)	41.6	)
Quite important	83	) 205	28.3	) 70.0
Half-half	65		22.2
Not quite important	15	)	5.1	)
Not important at all	8	) 23	2.7	) 7.8
Total	293		100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	6

Table 1d [Q1] In the course of constitutional reform, how important do you think it is to safeguard the interest of the middle-class?

	Frequency		Percentage
Very important	143	)	48.6	)
Quite important	95	) 238	32.3	) 81.0
Half-half	43		14.6
Not quite important	9	)	3.1	)
Not important at all	4	) 13	1.4	) 4.4
Total	294		100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	5

Table 1e [Q1] In the course of constitutional reform, how important do you think it is to safeguard the interest of the business sector?

	Frequency		Percentage
Very important	91	)	31.0	)
Quite important	92	) 183	31.3	) 62.2
Half-half	73		24.8
Not quite important	16	)	5.4	)
Not important at all	22	) 38	7.5	) 12.9
Total	294		100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	5

Table 1f [Q1] In the course of constitutional reform, how important do you think it is to safeguard the interest of the Central Government?

	Frequency		Percentage
Very important	84	)	28.7	)
Quite important	63	) 147	21.5	) 50.2
Half-half	73		24.9
Not quite important	36	)	12.3	)
Not important at all	35	) 71	11.9	) 24.2
Don't know	2		0.7
Total	293		100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	6

Table 2a [Q2] After the 2004 LegCo election, there will be 30 seats returned by functional constituencies and 30 by geographical constituencies. By 2008, how do you think the two types of seats should be distributed? (Note: You can set the total number of seats above or below 60 seats. If you think the functional constituencies should be abolished, please return a "0" against functional seats.) Functional constituencies:

	Frequency	Percentage
0	117	41.5
1 - 19	34	12.1
20	35	12.4
21 - 29	10	3.5
30	54	19.1
31 - 39	6	2.1
40	14	5.0
41 - 59	6	2.1
60	3	1.1
> 60	3	1.1
Total	282	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	17
Mean	17.9
Std. Error of Mean	1.94
Median	15.0
Mode	0
Minimum	0
Maximum	400

Table 2b [Q2] After the 2004 LegCo election, there will be 30 seats returned by functional constituencies and 30 by geographical constituencies. By 2008, how do you think the two types of seats should be distributed? (Note: You can set the total number of seats above or below 60 seats. If you think the functional constituencies should be abolished, please return a "0" against functional seats.) Geographical constituencies:

	Frequency	Percentage
0	7	2.5
1 - 19	5	1.8
20	7	2.5
21 - 29	2	0.7
30	41	14.5
31 - 39	15	5.3
40	37	13.1
41 - 59	38	13.5
60	108	38.3
> 60	22	7.8
Total	282	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	17
Mean	50.4
Std. Error of Mean	1.89
Median	50.0
Mode	60
Minimum	0
Maximum	400

Table 2c [Q2] After the 2004 LegCo election, there will be 30 seats returned by functional constituencies and 30 by geographical constituencies. By 2008, how do you think the two types of seats should be distributed? (Note: You can set the total number of seats above or below 60 seats. If you think the functional constituencies should be abolished, please return a "0" against functional seats.)
Total number of seats:

	Frequency	Percentage
< 60	19	6.7
60	207	73.4
> 60	56	19.9
Total	282	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	17

Table 2d [Q2] After the 2004 LegCo election, there will be 30 seats returned by functional constituencies and 30 by geographical constituencies. By 2008, how do you think the two types of seats should be distributed? (Note: You can set the total number of seats above or below 60 seats. If you think the functional constituencies should be abolished, please return a "0" against functional seats.)
Preferred distribution of seats between functional and geographical constituencies:

	Frequency	Percentage
All seats returned by geographical constituencies	115	41.1
Majority of seats returned by geographical constituencies	100	35.7
Equal number of seats returned by both types of constituencies*	46	16.4
Majority of seats returned by functional constituencies	14	5.0
All seats returned by functional constituencies	5	1.8
Total	280	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	19

*Excluding 2 cases who entered 0 for both types of constituencies.

Table 3 [Q3] Basic Law Article 68 stipulates that all members of LegCo should ultimately be returned by universal suffrage "in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." By which year do you think this target could be achieved?

	Frequency	Percentage
2004-06	7	2.4
2007-08	100	33.9
2009-11	8	2.7
2012	55	18.6
2013-15	3	1.0
2016	13	4.4
After 2016	28	9.5
Never be achieved	31	10.5
Don't know	48	16.3
ASAP	2	0.7
Total	295	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	4

Table 4 [Q4] One proposal on constitutional reform is to implement direct elections of all LegCo members by universal suffrage in three stages over a span of 20 years. The first stage would be an increase of 30 directly elected seats in the first two LegCo elections starting from 2008, i.e. 60 directly elected seats plus 30 functional constituency seats. The second stage would be to turn the election of the functional constituencies into a form of direct election after the first two LegCo elections were held. The third stage would be to implement direct election of the full legislature from the seventh LegCo election onwards, i.e. from the year 2024. Do you support or oppose this suggestion?

	Frequency	Percentage
Support	67	22.6
Neutral / No opinion	38	12.8
Oppose	187	63.2
Don't know	4	1.4
Total	296	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	3

Table 5 [Q5] Basic Law Article 45 stipulates that the Chief Executive should ultimately be returned by universal suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative nominating committee in accordance with democratic procedures, "in the light of the actual situation in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and in accordance with the principle of gradual and orderly progress." By which year do you think this target could be achieved?

	Frequency	Percentage
2004-06	6	2.0
2007-08	102	34.5
2009-11	10	3.4
2012	53	17.9
2013-15	6	2.0
2016	8	2.7
After 2016	38	12.8
Never be achieved	32	10.8
Don't know	40	13.5
ASAP	1	0.3
Total	296	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	3

Table 6 [Q6] Regarding the election of the Chief Executive, one proposal is to turn the 800-member Electoral Committee into a nomination committee which nominates a short list of candidates who are broadly acceptable by the Central Government. The Chief Executive would then be elected from the candidates by universal suffrage. This election method could be retained until the full legislature became directly elected. At that time, one-adult-one-vote universal suffrage could be implemented. Do you support or oppose this suggestion?

	Frequency	Percentage
Support	139	46.6
Neutral / No opinion	34	11.4
Oppose	119	39.9
Don't know	6	2.0
Total	298	100.0
Base	299
Missing case (s)	1